Beijing net connects public response to be appealed to forestall case

October 2, 2008

Dispatch of sina science and technology on September 27 message, beijing net connects 27 days to see partial media about in the morning, be accused in the light of its one case undertook forestall publish a response. Beijing net is connected express, did not receive forensic subpoena up to now, and report according to media, this case brief of a case serves antitrust of contract dispute and rather than for telecommunication. Accuser plum just makes the same score farther response to say, brief of a case already was changed in 24 days for antitrust.

China ” antitrust law ” formal on August 1 go into effect aroused 1000 billow. Beijing lawyer Li Fangping sued Beijing net to connect to the court namely on August 1 use monopoly position to be treated to foreigner difference. On September 16, this one law case by forensic put on record, be regarded as the antitrust proposal that first domestic courts accept by legal group public figure thereby.

Connect president to hold presiding apparitor Zun Xun concurrently to be born 17 days to be published in Hong Kong besides Chinese net ” the difference is treated do not involve rig to control a venture ” outside the view, as the accused, beijing net is connected did not express a view external all the time. 27 days morning, have the aid of ” Beijing cable building builds debut 50 years ” opportunity, beijing net commensuration saw the media such as sina science and technology, undertake publicity a response to this matter.

Beijing net connects news spokesman Li Litao at this point case published responded to at 2 o’clock: The first, beijing net connects the forensic subpoena that has not received this proposal up to now; The 2nd, according to media coverage, the brief of a case of this case is place a case on file for investigation and prosecution of dispute of telegraphic service contract, be not antitrust.

Sina science and technology contacted shape to accuse the accuser Li Fangping that the net connects again again, he admits, the brief of a case of this case is dispute of telegraphic service contract so, but the court has changed brief of a case in 24 days for antitrust, turn to cognizance of intellectual property front courtyard, “On September 24 afternoon, court of district of Beijing rising sun saw lawyer of this case representative about, civil Judge Liu of one front courtyard tells a representative the lawyer, according to the requirement of the supreme court, this case has turned to intellectual property front courtyard, the court hears choose an auspicious day. The court hears choose an auspicious day..

Beijing net connects those who reach Li Fangping afore-mentioned views all did not get court of district of Beijing rising sun confirm. Notable nevertheless is, here case brief of a case is changed for antitrust before this, li Fangping external besides making kind of professional media had carried brief of a case to one domestic discipline exercised by the head of a feudal household, allude rarely this case is contract dispute place a case on file for investigation and prosecution, just talk about antitrust.

On August 1, beijing lawyer Li Fangping is sued to the court say, because forestall executes a difference to the client so,Beijing net is connected external, when be like those who do not have Beijing registered permanent residence to install fixed phone in the newspaper, can choose only ” imprest fee business ” , the corresponding Beijing citizen that has Beijing number of households and total population can be dealt with ” hind business paying fee ” . (Establish hero)

Relevant report:

Lawyer plum just makes the same score Zhang Lihui: Beijing net is connected occupy 90% markets to make monopoly

The net connects CEO Zun Xun to be born: Imprest fee system does not involve rig

Tags: , , , ,

Laptop AC Adapters | Download Mp3 music | Calling cards | Drug tests | Metronidazol no prescription | Erection pills Cialis, Levitra

Hosting cPanel